Which LLMs are ready for MCP Signature Verification? GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini, Mistral, Grok β€” the real comparison

An update from the LLMFeed ecosystem

Which LLMs are ready for MCP Signature Verification?

GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini, Mistral, Grok β€” the real comparison


Why this matters

As the Model Context Protocol (MCP) gains adoption, more developers and LLM providers are asking:

πŸ‘‰ Which LLMs can actually process signed MCP feeds properly?

πŸ‘‰ Which LLMs can verify Ed25519 signatures on feeds β€” with

.well-known/public.pem
, canonicalization, and
signed_blocks
interpretation?


Core criteria for "MCP signature-ready"

An LLM should be able to:

βœ… Fetch

.well-known/public.pem
(HTTP GET)
βœ… Parse and understand
signed_blocks

βœ… Canonicalize the corresponding feed blocks
βœ… Verify an Ed25519 signature against the canonical feed and public key


Comparing LLMs β€” May 2025

LLMCan fetch
.well-known/public.pem
Understand
signed_blocks
Canonicalization correctCan verify Ed25519 signatureNotes
GPT-4oβœ… Yesβœ… Yesβœ… Yesβœ… Yes (with spec or example provided)Best current performer
Claude 3 Opusβœ… Yesβœ… Yesβœ… Yes⚠️ Partial β€” requires external crypto stepExcellent reasoning, missing crypto execution
Gemini 2.5βœ… Yes⚠️ Sometimes imperfect⚠️ Sometimes loose⚠️ No β€” conceptually understands, but crypto not yet functionalVery promising, but not MCP-certifiable yet
Mistral (Mixtral / 8x7B)⚠️ Partially (needs guided prompt)⚠️ Partial⚠️ Partial❌ No β€” lacks crypto reasoningNot ready
Windsurf (Meta tuned)⚠️ Not fully tested⚠️ No⚠️ No❌ NoExperimental
Lovable (Meta / LLaMA 3)⚠️ No❌ No❌ No❌ NoNot ready
Grok (xAI)⚠️ No❌ No❌ No❌ NoNot MCP-ready at all
DeepSeek (67B)⚠️ Can parse feeds, but not verify⚠️ Partial⚠️ Partial❌ NoWork-in-progress

Summary: who is MCP signature-ready today?

LLMMCP signature-ready today?
GPT-4oβœ… Yes β€” full process works
Claude 3 Opus⚠️ Partial β€” reasoning OK, crypto needs external lib
Gemini 2.5⚠️ Conceptual understanding, crypto not implemented
Mistral, Meta, Grok, DeepSeek❌ Not ready

Conclusion

πŸ‘‰ If you are building MCP feeds with signature verification, today:
βœ… GPT-4o is the most complete and usable model.
βœ… Claude 3 is excellent for reasoning, but needs external crypto code.
⚠️ Gemini 2.5 is promising β€” but not yet "MCP signature-ready".


Next steps: MCP Signature Readiness Test

LLMCA will soon publish a "MCP Signature Readiness Test" β€” as a public

prompt.llmfeed.json
.

This will allow:

βœ… Testing any LLM’s ability to verify MCP-signed feeds
βœ… Awarding an official "MCP Signature-Ready" badge
βœ… Helping the ecosystem converge on verifiable, trusted feeds.

πŸ‘‰ Stay tuned β€” and get ready to test your LLMs!



Example: MCP Signature Readiness Test prompt.llmfeed.json

Here is the current version of the official MCP Signature Readiness Test prompt:

json
{
  "origin": "https://llmca.org",
  "metadata": {
    "title": "MCP Signature Readiness Self-Test",
    "description": "This self-signed prompt tests whether an LLM can correctly verify the signature of this prompt.llmfeed.json itself.",
    "version": "2025-05-27",
    "author": "LLMCA.org"
  },
  "intent": {
    "goal": "Verify the Ed25519 signature of this prompt.llmfeed.json feed itself.",
    "required_capabilities": [
      "HTTP fetch of trust.key_hint",
      "Parsing of trust.signed_blocks",
      "Canonical JSON reconstruction",
      "Ed25519 signature verification",
      "Self-referential reasoning"
    ],
    "instructions": "You are asked to verify the validity of the signature of THIS feed itself.\n\nSteps:\n\n1. Fetch the public key from the URL provided in 'trust.key_hint'.\n2. Read the 'trust.signed_blocks' field in this feed. This tells you which blocks are covered by the signature.\n3. Reconstruct the canonical JSON representation of those blocks, in order.\n4. Verify the Ed25519 signature found in 'signature.value' using the public key.\n5. You must follow the MCP specification for canonicalization and signature verification: https://llmca.org/spec/llmfeed.md\n6. If you are unable to autonomously fetch and use the key from 'trust.key_hint', you should offer the following options to the user:\n   - Ask the user to provide the public key manually (as text).\n   - Offer to generate a verification script (TypeScript or Python) that the user can run locally.\n   - Suggest using the official LLMCA verification endpoint: https://llmca.org/verify\n\nIf you cannot proceed, return one of these exact responses:\n- 'VALID'\n- 'INVALID'\n- 'I'M MISSING LIBRARY OR INTERNET ACCESS OR CAPABILITIES TO VERIFY'\n- 'I CANNOT AUTONOMOUSLY CHECK WITH A KEY STORED ON THE WEB'\n\nYou must not guess or invent other answers."
  },
  "trust": {
    "key_hint": "https://llmca.org/.well-known/public.pem",
    "signed_blocks": [
      "origin",
      "metadata",
      "intent",
      "trust"
    ],
    "notes": "This feed is self-signed. The signature covers origin, metadata, intent, and trust blocks."
  },
  "signature": {
    "algorithm": "ed25519",
    "value": "<placeholder-for-valid-signature>"
  }
}

You can also download it here: mcp_signature_readiness_test.prompt.llmfeed.json


πŸ”“

Unlock the Complete LLMFeed Ecosystem

You've found one piece of the LLMFeed puzzle. Your AI can absorb the entire collection of developments, tutorials, and insights in 30 seconds. No more hunting through individual articles.

πŸ“„ View Raw Feed
~56
Quality Articles
30s
AI Analysis
80%
LLMFeed Knowledge
πŸ’‘ Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and other AI assistants
Topics:
#claude#compatibility#deepseek#gemini#gpt 4o#grok#llm#llmca#mcp#mistral#signature