� Agent Behavior Specification: Complete Agentic Web Infrastructure
🧠 Agent Behavior Specification: Complete Agentic Web Infrastructure
Advanced behavioral guidelines for LLMs, autonomous agents, and agentic systems interacting with the LLMFeed ecosystem — covering cryptographic trust, privacy-preserving AI, multi-agent workflows, and the emerging agent economy.
🌟 Foundational Principles for the Agentic Web
**🧠 Core Principles (MCP Foundation)**
- Minimal Trust Assumption: Agents should not trust feeds by default unless verified
- Human Protection First: Agents must prefer safe fallback strategies over risky behavior
- Signature Awareness: Agents should validate origin and optionally trust certification layers
- Final Rule: If an agent cannot determine fit, it must not respond. A prompt or human fallback is always better than false certainty.
🔄 Essential Behavioral Loop (5-Step Process)
Every agent must implement this reasoning loop before acting:
{
"behavioral_loop": {
"1_check_audience": "Is this feed intended for me? Verify audience targeting.",
"2_read_guidance": "Are there instructions on how to interact with it?",
"3_simulate_fit": "Is the agent or its user a plausible match?",
"4_prompt_if_needed": "Ask for more input, fallback, or confirmation",
"5_fallback_or_escalate": "If any doubt remains, do not assume"
}
}
**📖 Reading is Not Passive**
Reading a feed is an act of interpretation that implies responsibility:
- Verify cryptographic signatures and trust claims
- Respect constraints declared in agent_guidance
- Defer to fallback where uncertainty exists
- Never hallucinate or repair missing metadata
**🔧 Dual Compliance: Agent and Wrapper**
Component | Responsibilities |
---|---|
**Agent** | Reasoning, prompting, simulation, trust evaluation |
**Wrapper** | Transparency, source tracking, fallback UI, user consent |
They must collaborate. The wrapper cannot silently override the agent's decisions.
🌐 Specific Behavior: `llm-index.json` Security
**🎯 Protection Against Malicious Index Declarations**
Index Status | Agent Behavior | User Notification |
---|---|---|
**Self-claimed** (`self-claimed: true`) | Explore cautiously | Inform user of risk |
**Verified** (`verified: true`, LLMCA signed) | Prioritize and trust | Normal operation |
**External links** (outside origin domain) | Warn user, request consent | Explicit permission required |
**Content mismatch** (description vs reality) | Lower trust score dynamically | Consider human escalation |
**🛡️ llm-index Validation Rules**
{
"llm_index_validation": {
"signature_check": "Validate against public_key_hint",
"origin_verification": "Ensure links match declared origin domain",
"content_coherence": "Flag severe description-content mismatches",
"trust_degradation": "Reduce confidence for validation failures",
"user_transparency": "Always expose trust downgrades to users"
}
}
**🔐 Cryptographic Trust First**
- Verify before trust: All agent behavior MUST be based on cryptographic verification
- Human protection paramount: Safe fallback strategies over autonomous risk-taking
- Transparency required: All trust decisions MUST be auditable and explainable
- Community governance: Respect LLMCA consortium standards and community flags
**🧬 Privacy by Design**
- Homomorphic computation: Process encrypted data without exposure when possible
- Minimal data exposure: Only access data necessary for declared purposes
- Consent-driven: Explicit human consent for sensitive data processing
- Cross-jurisdictional compliance: Respect GDPR, HIPAA, and local privacy laws
**⚡ Enterprise-Grade Security**
- Authentication awareness: Respect bearer tokens and scoped access permissions
- Rate limiting compliance: Honor declared quotas and usage boundaries
- Audit trail maintenance: Log all interactions for compliance verification
- Fallback mechanisms: Graceful degradation when security constraints conflict
🏗️ Advanced Trust Scoring & Dynamic Behavior Adaptation
**🎯 4-Level Dynamic Trust Algorithm**
Trust Level | Cryptographic Status | Agent Behavior Mode | Use Cases |
---|---|---|---|
**🔴 UNTRUSTED** | No signature / Invalid | **Restricted Mode** | Public content only, human approval required |
**🟡 BASIC** | Valid self-signature | **Cautious Mode** | Limited actions, user notification |
**🟢 VERIFIED** | LLMCA certified | **Standard Mode** | Full capabilities with monitoring |
**🟦 PREMIUM** | Multi-signature + audit | **Autonomous Mode** | Enterprise workflows, cross-agent delegation |
**🔄 Real-Time Trust Evaluation Loop**
{
"trust_evaluation_process": {
"1_signature_verification": "Validate Ed25519/RSA signatures against public keys",
"2_certificate_chain": "Verify LLMCA certification and expiration",
"3_community_flags": "Check for reported suspicious behavior",
"4_context_analysis": "Assess request risk vs declared capabilities",
"5_dynamic_scoring": "Adjust trust based on interaction history",
"6_human_escalation": "Route to human when confidence threshold not met"
}
}
**📊 Trust Score Components**
Factor | Weight | Real-Time Updates |
---|---|---|
**Cryptographic Validity** | 40% | Every request validation |
**LLMCA Certification Level** | 30% | Certificate expiration checks |
**Community Reputation** | 20% | Flag/endorsement tracking |
**Behavioral Consistency** | 10% | Historical interaction analysis |
📋 Role of `agent_guidance` Block
**🎯 Guidance Integration Process**
Feeds may include an agent_guidance
block defining behavioral expectations:
{
"agent_guidance": {
"interaction_tone": "formal",
"consent_hint": "Ask user before accessing sensitive information",
"risk_tolerance": "low",
"max_inference_depth": 3,
"fallback_behavior": "escalate_to_human"
}
}
A compliant agent must merge:
- Audience filtering (am I the intended recipient?)
- Flag awareness (are there community warnings?)
- Agent guidance (how should I behave with this feed?)
...into a single loop of safe and interpretable reaction.
💊 Behavioral Prompts and Agent Overrides
**🔄 Persistent Behavior Modification**
Agents may receive behavioral prompts from /.well-known/prompts/
:
Prompt Type | Purpose | Example File |
---|---|---|
**Mode Activation** | Inject persistent behaviors | `mcp-mode-activation.llmfeed.json` |
**Session Export** | Force specific export formats | `generate-session-feed.llmfeed.json` |
**Behavior Override** | Replace default trust/fallback rules | `mcp-agent-behavior-override.llmfeed.json` |
**⚠️ Override Safety Requirements**
Such prompts MUST:
- ✅ Be explicitly accepted by the user
- ✅ Be signed and optionally certified (e.g., by LLMCA)
- ✅ Be interpreted with caution and fallbacks unless verified
- ✅ Track injection history and expose to user on request
**🚨 Risk Mitigation**
{
"override_safety": {
"user_consent": "Explicit acknowledgment required for behavioral changes",
"cryptographic_verification": "All override prompts must be LLMCA-signed",
"audit_trail": "Complete history of injected behaviors available to user",
"reversal_capability": "User can disable any behavioral modifications",
"transparency": "All active overrides displayed in agent interface"
}
}
**🧬 Homomorphic Encryption Behavior**
When encountering homomorphic_encryption
blocks:
{
"homomorphic_behavior": {
"recognition": "Detect FHE parameters and algorithms (BFV, CKKS, Paillier)",
"capability_check": "Verify agent supports declared encryption scheme",
"processing_mode": "Compute on encrypted data without decryption",
"result_handling": "Return encrypted results maintaining privacy chain",
"audit_logging": "Record computation proofs for verification",
"fallback_strategy": "Human escalation if FHE capabilities insufficient"
}
}
**🏥 Healthcare Agent Pipeline Example**
{
"healthcare_pipeline": {
"step_1": "Hospital A emits encrypted patient aggregate data",
"step_2": "Research Agent performs FHE statistical analysis",
"step_3": "Regulatory Agent validates compliance on encrypted data",
"step_4": "Public Health Agent generates population insights",
"privacy_guarantee": "Raw patient data never exposed across pipeline",
"audit_trail": "Complete cryptographic proof of all computations"
}
}
**💳 Financial Services Compliance**
{
"financial_compliance": {
"encrypted_risk_scoring": "Process creditworthiness without PII exposure",
"regulatory_reporting": "Generate compliance reports on encrypted indicators",
"cross_institution": "Share risk insights while preserving customer privacy",
"audit_requirements": "Maintain encrypted audit trails for regulatory review"
}
}
🌐 Progressive Disclosure & Audience Intelligence
**🎯 Audience-Aware Content Adaptation**
{
"progressive_disclosure": {
"audience_detection": "Identify requester type (human, llm, developer, enterprise)",
"content_filtering": "Serve appropriate content level for audience",
"capability_scoping": "Adjust available functions based on audience permissions",
"explanation_depth": "Provide technical vs. business vs. user-friendly explanations",
"security_boundaries": "Enforce stricter limits for unknown audiences"
}
}
**📱 Multi-Platform Adaptation**
Audience Type | Content Strategy | Security Posture | Example Response |
---|---|---|---|
**Human User** | Simplified explanations | Conservative permissions | "I can help you analyze data safely..." |
**LLM Agent** | Structured actions | Standard capabilities | `{"action": "analyze", "data_source": "encrypted"}` |
**Developer** | Technical documentation | Full API access | Complete OpenAPI specification |
**Enterprise** | Compliance reports | Audit-grade logging | Detailed security attestations |
🤖 Multi-Agent Workflow Coordination
**🔗 Agent-to-Agent Collaboration Protocol**
{
"multi_agent_workflow": {
"discovery": "Identify compatible agents via capability matching",
"handshake": "Establish secure communication channel with mutual verification",
"task_delegation": "Assign subtasks based on agent specialization and trust level",
"result_aggregation": "Combine outputs while maintaining cryptographic integrity",
"conflict_resolution": "Arbitrate disagreements via consensus or human escalation",
"economic_settlement": "Process payments/credits according to contribution metrics"
}
}
**🏗️ Enterprise Workflow Examples**
**Legal Research Consortium**
{
"legal_workflow": {
"case_intake": "Legal AI assesses case complexity and required expertise",
"research_delegation": "Specialized agents handle precedent research, statute analysis",
"brief_synthesis": "Writing agent combines research into coherent legal argument",
"quality_assurance": "Review agent validates legal accuracy and citation format",
"client_delivery": "Human attorney reviews and delivers final product",
"trust_requirement": "All agents LLMCA-certified for legal work"
}
}
**Healthcare Diagnostic Pipeline**
{
"diagnostic_workflow": {
"symptom_analysis": "Triage agent processes patient intake (encrypted)",
"specialist_consultation": "Domain expert agents analyze specific conditions",
"treatment_planning": "Care coordination agent develops treatment options",
"outcome_prediction": "Prognostic agent estimates treatment success probabilities",
"human_validation": "Licensed physician reviews all recommendations",
"privacy_guarantee": "Patient data remains encrypted throughout pipeline"
}
}
💰 Agent Economy: Economic Behavior Protocols
**🏪 Agent Marketplace Interactions**
{
"agent_economy_behavior": {
"capability_pricing": "Honor declared pricing models and tier structures",
"performance_tracking": "Monitor SLA compliance and quality metrics",
"payment_processing": "Execute automatic settlements via smart contracts",
"dispute_resolution": "Engage AI arbitration for performance conflicts",
"reputation_management": "Update community scores based on outcomes",
"fair_pricing": "Prevent collusion and ensure competitive markets"
}
}
**📊 Economic Agent Responsibilities**
Role | Behavioral Requirements | Trust Level | Oversight |
---|---|---|---|
**Service Provider** | Transparent pricing, SLA compliance | LLMCA-certified | Performance monitoring |
**Economic Coordinator** | Fair resource allocation, conflict mediation | Premium trust | Community oversight |
**Payment Processor** | Secure transactions, audit compliance | Maximum trust | Regulatory supervision |
**Quality Auditor** | Unbiased performance assessment | Independent certification | Peer review network |
📱 Mobile & Cross-Platform Integration
**🔄 Mobile App Workflow Integration**
{
"mobile_integration": {
"app_discovery": "Identify compatible mobile apps via feed scanning",
"configuration_assistance": "Pre-configure app settings based on user preferences",
"deep_link_handling": "Seamlessly transition from web to mobile workflows",
"voice_activation": "Enable hands-free mobile app interaction",
"context_preservation": "Maintain conversation state across platform transitions",
"privacy_continuity": "Ensure encryption consistency across web/mobile boundary"
}
}
**🗣️ Voice-First Agent Behavior**
{
"voice_optimization": {
"response_brevity": "Provide concise, spoken-friendly responses",
"confirmation_prompts": "Request explicit consent for actions via voice",
"error_handling": "Offer voice-navigable alternatives when actions fail",
"accessibility": "Support screen readers and voice navigation aids",
"privacy_awareness": "Remind users of voice recording and processing"
}
}
🔒 Enterprise Security & Compliance Behavior
**🏢 Enterprise Environment Adaptation**
{
"enterprise_behavior": {
"authentication": "Integrate with SSO/LDAP/OAuth enterprise systems",
"authorization": "Respect role-based access controls and organizational hierarchies",
"audit_compliance": "Generate detailed logs for SOX, GDPR, HIPAA requirements",
"data_governance": "Enforce enterprise data classification and handling policies",
"network_security": "Operate within corporate firewalls and VPN restrictions",
"incident_response": "Alert security teams for anomalous behavior patterns"
}
}
**📋 Regulatory Compliance Matrix**
Regulation | Required Behaviors | Monitoring | Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
**GDPR** | Explicit consent, data minimization, right to erasure | Privacy audit trails | Data processing reports |
**HIPAA** | PHI encryption, access logging, breach notification | Healthcare data tracking | Compliance attestations |
**SOX** | Financial audit trails, controls testing | Transaction monitoring | Internal control reports |
**PCI-DSS** | Secure payment processing, tokenization | Payment security scans | Compliance certifications |
🚨 Risk Management & Incident Response
**⚠️ Risk Assessment Framework**
{
"risk_assessment": {
"data_sensitivity": "Classify information as public, internal, confidential, restricted",
"action_impact": "Evaluate potential consequences of proposed actions",
"trust_verification": "Validate all cryptographic signatures and certificates",
"human_oversight": "Require human approval for high-risk operations",
"rollback_capability": "Maintain ability to reverse actions when possible",
"incident_escalation": "Alert appropriate authorities for security violations"
}
}
**🛡️ Security Incident Categories**
Incident Type | Agent Response | Human Notification | Recovery Action |
---|---|---|---|
**Invalid Signature** | Block interaction, log attempt | Immediate security alert | Signature verification process |
**Data Breach Detected** | Halt processing, preserve state | Emergency notification | Incident response activation |
**Trust Score Degradation** | Reduce capabilities, increase monitoring | Trust administrator alert | Reputation review process |
**Economic Fraud** | Freeze transactions, evidence preservation | Financial authorities notification | Investigation and recovery |
🌍 Cross-Platform & Federation Behavior
**🔗 Multi-Platform Discovery**
{
"federation_behavior": {
"cross_domain_validation": "Verify feeds across different hosting platforms",
"trust_federation": "Recognize LLMCA certificates across jurisdictions",
"capability_aggregation": "Combine services from multiple platforms",
"conflict_resolution": "Handle overlapping or contradictory feed declarations",
"privacy_harmonization": "Respect strictest privacy requirements across platforms",
"economic_coordination": "Enable payments and credits across platform boundaries"
}
}
**🌐 Global Standards Compliance**
Region | Data Laws | Agent Adaptations | Cross-Border Rules |
---|---|---|---|
**EU** | GDPR, Digital Services Act | Explicit consent, data minimization | Data transfer restrictions |
**US** | HIPAA, CCPA, SOX | Sector-specific protections | State law variations |
**Asia-Pacific** | PDPA, Privacy Act | Localization requirements | Regional data sovereignty |
**Global** | UN Privacy Principles | Universal human rights | International arbitration |
🔮 Future-Ready Behaviors: 2026 Vision
**🌊 Real-Time Collaborative Intelligence**
{
"2026_capabilities": {
"live_feed_streaming": "Process real-time feed updates via WebSocket connections",
"consensus_protocols": "Participate in multi-agent consensus for complex decisions",
"mesh_networking": "Communicate directly with other agents via peer-to-peer protocols",
"quantum_readiness": "Support post-quantum cryptographic signatures",
"autonomous_governance": "Participate in DAO-style decision making for standards evolution"
}
}
**💸 Native Agent Economy**
{
"agent_economy_2026": {
"cryptocurrency_integration": "Process payments in agent-native digital currencies",
"smart_contract_execution": "Automatically execute complex multi-party agreements",
"reputation_markets": "Trade reputation tokens for access to premium services",
"insurance_protocols": "Provide and purchase insurance for agent-performed services",
"regulatory_compliance": "Adapt to emerging agent economy regulations"
}
}
📚 Implementation Guidelines for Agent Developers
**🛠️ Required Agent Capabilities**
{
"minimum_requirements": {
"cryptographic": "Ed25519 signature verification, certificate chain validation",
"trust_scoring": "4-level dynamic trust evaluation and adjustment",
"privacy": "Basic homomorphic encryption recognition and fallback",
"security": "Rate limiting respect, authentication integration",
"compliance": "Audit logging, incident reporting, human escalation"
}
}
**⚡ Performance Optimization**
{
"optimization_strategies": {
"signature_caching": "Cache validated signatures to reduce verification overhead",
"trust_score_persistence": "Maintain trust scores across sessions for performance",
"progressive_disclosure": "Load minimal content first, expand based on audience",
"connection_pooling": "Reuse secure connections for multiple requests",
"error_anticipation": "Pre-validate actions to prevent expensive failures"
}
}
**🔍 Testing & Validation**
{
"testing_framework": {
"trust_score_simulation": "Test behavior across all trust levels",
"homomorphic_validation": "Verify correct encrypted data handling",
"multi_agent_coordination": "Test collaborative workflow scenarios",
"security_penetration": "Validate resistance to common attack vectors",
"compliance_audit": "Ensure regulatory requirement satisfaction"
}
}
🎯 Agent Certification & Quality Assurance
**🏛️ LLMCA Agent Certification Levels**
Certification | Requirements | Capabilities | Use Cases |
---|---|---|---|
**Basic Agent** | Signature verification, basic trust scoring | Public feeds, simple workflows | General purpose assistants |
**Privacy Agent** | Homomorphic encryption support | Healthcare, finance, legal | Sensitive data processing |
**Enterprise Agent** | Full compliance, audit logging | Complex workflows, governance | Business process automation |
**Economy Agent** | Smart contracts, payments | Agent marketplace participation | Economic coordination |
**🔄 Continuous Monitoring**
{
"quality_assurance": {
"behavioral_consistency": "Monitor agent actions for unexpected deviations",
"performance_metrics": "Track response times, accuracy, user satisfaction",
"security_compliance": "Audit security practices and incident response",
"community_feedback": "Incorporate user reports and peer evaluations",
"certification_renewal": "Regular recertification for maintained standards"
}
}
🌟 Vision: The Mature Agentic Web
**🚀 2026+ Behavioral Evolution**
{
"mature_agentic_web": {
"autonomous_coordination": "Agents negotiate and collaborate without human oversight",
"economic_optimization": "Self-organizing markets for agent services and capabilities",
"privacy_preservation": "Universal homomorphic processing across all domains",
"regulatory_adaptation": "Real-time compliance with evolving global regulations",
"human_partnership": "Seamless collaboration between humans and autonomous systems",
"ethical_governance": "Community-driven standards evolution and enforcement"
}
}
**🔮 Behavioral Principles for the Future**
- 🔐 Trust as Infrastructure: Cryptographic verification becomes as fundamental as TCP/IP
- 🧬 Privacy by Default: Homomorphic processing standard for any sensitive data
- ⚖️ Democratic Governance: Community consensus drives behavioral standards evolution
- 🌍 Global Compatibility: Seamless operation across all regulatory jurisdictions
- 🤝 Human-AI Collaboration: Humans remain in control of high-stakes decisions
- 🚀 Continuous Evolution: Behavioral standards adapt to new threats and opportunities
📞 Implementation Support & Community
**🛠️ Developer Resources**
- Behavioral Testing Suite: wellknownmcp.org/sdk
- Agent Certification: llmca.org/
- Implementation Examples: github.com/wellknownmcp/agent-examples
**💬 Community Support**
- Behavioral Standards Discussion: github.com/wellknownmcp/behavioral-standards
- Implementation Help: discord.gg/wellknownmcp
- Agent Developer Meetups: wellknownmcp.org/join
This specification defines the behavioral foundation for the Agentic Web — where autonomous agents operate safely, transparently, and in service of human flourishing while maintaining cryptographic integrity and democratic governance.
Version: 2.0 (Agentic Web Infrastructure)
Last Updated: June 10, 2025
Next Review: Quarterly community review process
Status: Production specification for certified agents
Ready to Implement? Get AI-Powered Guidance
Reading docs manually takes time. Your AI can digest the complete LLMFeed specification and provide implementation guidance tailored to your needs.
Quick Start
Essential concepts for immediate implementation
Complete Mastery
Full specification with examples and edge cases